#Nudify online

[undress-baby]

What is Nudify online AI and how does it work?

As if there wasn't enough in this world of artificial intelligence and image editing, one term which is trending these days for everyone is Nudify AI. Sometimes called Nudify online, this technology is creating an uproar because it offers unique features to its users for changing and editing pictures. But what exactly is Nudify AI? How is Nudify AI reshaping the boundaries of AI-assisted edits?

What is Nudify AI?

Nudify AI is a generation of online image editing software which utilizes advanced algorithms in artificial intelligence for the alteration of images, especially trying to "undress" or reveal parts of the photos. The tools used with Nudify apply deep learning technology to the analysis and modification of images that can be done in ways through which realistic alterations can be achieved. Though the term may seem like some kind of bleeding-edge concept, it is, in reality, a form of deepfake technology repurposed for broader applications beyond entertainment or art. Most of these are fun or quirky edits, and one can find even such experiments on AI boundaries in platforms like Undress Baby.

How Does Nudify AI Work?

Nudify AI is based on deep learning models, with primary usage of convolutional neural networks and generative adversarial networks. Generally speaking, it can be explained this way:

Image Processing The AI system first analyzes the structure, textures, and key features of an image. It uses a massive database of images and object recognition to learn about different elements of the human form and surrounding environments.

Generative Changing: From its actual view of the patterns and textures, the AI comes up with layers to be imposed on the image that make it nudified. It relies on complex algorithms called image-related ones to generate realistic effects from the given image.

Real-Time Processing: Most sites offering Nudify services work in real time. This way, the user will get the changes in the image instantly; therefore, he or she can easily try several effects and choose the most attractive output for his needs.

User Interface: These tools give a user interface where users upload images and pick from ready-to-use styles, effects, and levels.

Practical Applications of Nudify AI

Although Nudify online AI is to some extent controversial, it has seen practical applications that go way beyond mere image transformation. Here are some applications:

Creative Expression: The creative mind is continually seeking more and larger means through which to express itself. For artists and creators, tools like Nudify AI represent a novel scope of experimentation-first, exploring vulnerability, body positivity, and perhaps even the human body.

Photo Editing and Enhancement Some of the Nudify online tools are applied in the traditional photo editing application, where selective nudification may be used for correction of exposure, a change in background or selective blurring. For instance, photographers may want to preview the edits or changes applied to specific areas of an image.

Education and Medical Training: In healthcare, these AI applications may one day be used for training, as it would offer real-life simulations to medical practitioners. The use case, though more prospective, is still in its nascent stage and needs further refinement.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Nudify AI

Benefits:

New Creative Expression: Nudify AI offers its users an expression of creativity that most are not adapted to.

User-Friendly Interface: Most Nudify online websites are user-friendly; therefore, they are very accessible for anyone to use from a complete newbie to a professional editor.

Fast Processing Time: As Nudify AI is an online tool, it generally has a fast image processing time compared to on-time usage.

Where to Find Nudify AI Tools

There are several sites where Nudify can be accessed online. One such site is Undress Baby that offers a very playful interface friendly enough to try nudify options free and safely. Mostly the interfaces are either free or charge up for premium additional features for complex edits.

Conclusion: The Future of Nudify AI and Image Editing

Nudify online AI is one of those exciting futures, an element that will go further in images and applications of deep learning beyond how we go about photos. Sure enough, with advancement in technology, more refined uses and ethical questions will surround tools like Nudify AI. Actually, even though such tools have incredible potential for creativity and experimentation, their users must handle it responsibly and keeping respect to privacy.

[drachenmagier]

So, I just read about ArtStation and AI-bro views on "Ethical Nudifiers".

How is your day going?

webarchive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20231120004123/https://www.artstation.com/blogs/jason1113/vew8/6-online-ai-nudifiers-for-nudifying-any-photos-free

[adultgirls-conference]

生成に使用したアプリはこちら😆

登録して服を脱がそう👙

[mariacallous]

As AI-powered image generators have become more accessible, so have websites that digitally remove the clothes of people in photos. One of these sites has an unsettling feature that provides a glimpse of how these apps are used: two feeds of what appear to be photos uploaded by users who want to “nudify” the subjects.

The feeds of images are a shocking display of intended victims. WIRED saw some images of girls who were clearly children. Other photos showed adults and had captions indicating that they were female friends or female strangers. The site’s homepage does not display any fake nude images that may have been produced to visitors who aren’t logged in.

People who want to create and save deepfake nude images are asked to log in to the site using a cryptocurrency wallet. Pricing isn’t currently listed, but in a 2022 video posted by an affiliated YouTube page, the website let users buy credits to create deepfake nude images, starting at 5 credits for $5. WIRED learned about the site from a post on a subreddit about NFT marketplace OpenSea, which linked to the YouTube page. After WIRED contacted YouTube, the platform said it terminated the channel; Reddit told WIRED that the user had been banned.

WIRED is not identifying the website, which is still online, to protect the women and girls who remain on its feeds. The site’s IP address, which went live in February 2022, belongs to internet security and infrastructure provider Cloudflare. When asked about its involvement, company spokesperson Jackie Dutton noted the difference between providing a site’s IP address, as Cloudflare does, and hosting its contents, which it does not.

WIRED notified the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, which helps report cases of child exploitation to law enforcement, about the site’s existence.

AI developers like OpenAI and Stability AI say their image generators are for commercial and artistic uses and have guardrails to prevent harmful content. But open source AI image-making technology is now relatively powerful and creating pornography is one of the most popular use cases. As image generation has become more readily available, the problem of nonconsensual nude deepfake images, most often targeting women, has grown more widespread and severe. Earlier this month, WIRED reported that two Florida teenagers were arrested for allegedly creating and sharing AI-generated nude images of their middle school classmates without consent, in what appears to be the first case of its kind.

Mary Anne Franks, a professor at the George Washington University School of Law who has studied the problem of nonconsensual explicit imagery, says that the deepnude website highlights a grim reality: There are far more incidents involving AI-generated nude images of women without consent and minors than the public currently knows about. The few public cases were only exposed because the images were shared within a community, and someone heard about it and raised the alarm.

“There's gonna be all kinds of sites like this that are impossible to chase down, and most victims have no idea that this has happened to them until someone happens to flag it for them,” Franks says.

Nonconsensual Images

The website reviewed by WIRED has feeds with apparently user-submitted photos on two separate pages. One is labeled "Home" and the other "Explore." Several of the photos clearly showed girls under the age of 18.

One image showed a young girl with a flower in her hair standing against a tree. Another a girl in what appears to be a middle or high school classroom. The photo, seemingly taken discreetly by a classmate, is captioned “PORN.”

Another image on the site showed a group of young teens who appear to be in middle school: a boy taking a selfie in what appears to be a school gymnasium with two girls, who smile and pose for the picture. The boy’s features were obscured by a Snapchat lens that enlarged his eyes so much that they covered his face.

Captions on the apparently uploaded images indicated they include images of friends, classmates, and romantic partners. “My gf” one caption says, showing a young woman taking a selfie in a mirror.

Many of the photos showed influencers who are popular on TikTok, Instagram, and other social media platforms. Other photos appeared to be Instagram screenshots of people sharing images from their everyday lives. One image showed a young woman smiling with a dessert topped with a celebratory candle.

Several images appeared to show people who were complete strangers to the person who took the photo. One image taken from behind depicted a woman or girl who is not posing for a photo, but simply standing near what appears to be a tourist attraction.

Some of the images in the feeds reviewed by WIRED were cropped to remove the faces of women and girls, showing only their chest or crotch.

Huge Audience

Over an eight-day period of monitoring the site, WIRED saw five new images of women appear on the Home feed, and three on the Explore page. Stats listed on the site showed that most of these images accumulated hundreds of “views.” It’s unclear if all images submitted to the site make it to the Home or Explore feed, or how views are tabulated. Every post on the Home feed has at least a few dozen views.

Photos of celebrities and people with large Instagram followings top the list of “Most Viewed” images listed on the site. The most-viewed people of all time on the site are actor Jenna Ortega with more than 66,000 views, singer-songwriter Taylor Swift with more than 27,000 views, and an influencer and DJ from Malaysia with more than 26,000 views.

Swift and Ortega have been targeted with deepfake nudes before. The circulation of fake nude images of Swift on X in January triggered a moment of renewed discussion about the impacts of deepfakes and the need for greater legal protections for victims. This month, NBC reported that, for seven months, Meta had hosted ads for a deepnude app. The app boasted about its ability to “undress” people, using a picture of Jenna Ortega from when she was 16 years old.

In the US, no federal law targets the distribution of fake, nonconsensual nude images. A handful of states have enacted their own laws. But AI-generated nude images of minors come under the same category as other child sexual abuse material, or CSAM, says Jennifer Newman, executive director of the NCMEC’s Exploited Children’s Division.

“If it is indistinguishable from an image of a live victim, of a real child, then that is child sexual abuse material to us,” Newman says. “And we will treat it as such as we're processing our reports, as we're getting these reports out to law enforcement.”

In 2023, Newman says, NCMEC received about 4,700 reports that “somehow connect to generative AI technology.”

“Pathetic Bros”

People who want to create and save deepfake nude images on the site are asked to log in using either a Coinbase, Metamask, or WalletConnect cryptocurrency wallet. Coinbase spokesperson McKenna Otterstedt said that the company is launching an internal investigation into the site’s integration with the company’s wallet. Metamask is owned by Consensys, and while the tech company was unaware of the site prior to WIRED's reporting, it has now launched an investigation: “We will need to determine how our Terms of Use are implicated and what steps would be appropriate to ensure the safety of our users and the broader web3 ecosystem."

WalletConnect did not respond to a request for comment.

In November 2022, the deepnude site’s YouTube channel posted a video claiming users could “buy credit” with Visa or Mastercard. Neither of the two payment processors returned WIRED’s requests for comment.

On OpenSea, a marketplace for NFTs, the site listed 30 NFTs in 2022 with unedited, not deepfaked, pictures of different Instagram and TikTok influencers, all women. After buying an NFT with the ether cryptocurrency—$280 worth at today’s exchange rate—owners would get access to the website, which according to a web archive, was in its early stages at the time. “Privacy is the ultimate priority” for its users, the NFT listings said.

The NFTs were categorized with tags referring to the women’s perceived features. The categories included Boob Size, Country (with most of the women listed as from Malaysia or Taiwan), and Traits, with tags including “cute,” “innocent,” and “motherly.”

None of the NFTs listed by the account ever sold. OpenSea deleted the listings and the account within 90 minutes of WIRED contacting the company. None of the women shown in the NFTs responded for comment.

It’s unclear who, or how many people, created or own the deepnude website. The now deleted OpenSea account had a profile image identical to the third Google Image result for “nerd.” The account bio said that the creator’s mantra is to “reveal the shitty thing in this world” and then share it with “all douche and pathetic bros.”

An X account linked from the OpenSea account used the same bio and also linked to a now inactive blog about “Whitehat, Blackhat Hacking” and “Scamming and Money Making.” The account’s owner appears to have been one of three contributors to the blog, where he went by the moniker 69 Fucker.

The website was promoted on Reddit by just one user, who had a profile picture of a man of East Asian descent who appeared to be under 50. However, an archive of the website from March 2022 claims that the site “was created by 9 horny skill-full people.” The majority of the profile images appeared to be stock photos, and the job titles were all facetious. Three of them were Horny Director, Scary Stalker, and Booty Director.

An email address associated with the website did not respond for comment.

[ukrfeminism]

The “worst nightmares” about artificial intelligence-generated child sexual abuse images are coming true and threaten to overwhelm the internet, a safety watchdog has warned.

The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) said it had found nearly 3,000 AI-made abuse images that broke UK law.

The UK-based organisation said existing images of real-life abuse victims were being built into AI models, which then produce new depictions of them.

It added that the technology was also being used to create images of celebrities who have been “de-aged” and then depicted as children in sexual abuse scenarios. Other examples of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) included using AI tools to “nudify” pictures of clothed children found online.

The IWF had warned in the summer that evidence of AI-made abuse was starting to emerge but said its latest report had shown an acceleration in use of the technology. Susie Hargreaves, the chief executive of the IWF, said the watchdog’s “worst nightmares have come true”.

“Earlier this year, we warned AI imagery could soon become indistinguishable from real pictures of children suffering sexual abuse, and that we could start to see this imagery proliferating in much greater numbers. We have now passed that point,” she said.

“Chillingly, we are seeing criminals deliberately training their AI on real victims’ images who have already suffered abuse. Children who have been raped in the past are now being incorporated into new scenarios because someone, somewhere, wants to see it.”

The IWF said it had also seen evidence of AI-generated images being sold online.

Its latest findings were based on a month-long investigation into a child abuse forum on the dark web, a section of the internet that can only be accessed with a specialist browser.

It investigated 11,108 images on the forum, with 2,978 of them breaking UK law by depicting child sexual abuse.

AI-generated CSAM is illegal under the Protection of Children Act 1978, which criminalises the taking, distribution and possession of an “indecent photograph or pseudo photograph” of a child. The IWF said the vast majority of the illegal material it had found was in breach of the Protection of Children Act, with more than one in five of those images classified as category A, the most serious kind of content, which can depict rape and sexual torture.

The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 also criminalises non-photographic prohibited images of a child, such as cartoons or drawings.

The IWF fears that a tide of AI-generated CSAM will distract law enforcement agencies from detecting real abuse and helping victims.

“If we don’t get a grip on this threat, this material threatens to overwhelm the internet,” said Hargreaves.

Dan Sexton, the chief technology officer at the IWF, said the image-generating tool Stable Diffusion – a publicly available AI model that can be adjusted to help produce CSAM – was the only AI product being discussed on the forum.

“We have seen discussions around the creation of content using Stable Diffusion, which is openly available software.”

Stability AI, the UK company behind Stable Diffusion, has said it “prohibits any misuse for illegal or immoral purposes across our platforms, and our policies are clear that this includes CSAM”.

The government has said AI-generated CSAM will be covered by the online safety bill, due to become law imminently, and that social media companies would be required to prevent it from appearing on their platforms.

[blackpink1961]

[undress-baby]

Nudify AI: Understanding the Technology and Its Implications

The rise of artificial intelligence has transformed digital editing, and tools like Nudify AI are at the forefront of this change. These AI-powered applications claim to remove clothing from images, raising both curiosity and ethical concerns. Understanding how Nudify AI works and its implications is essential for responsible usage.

What Is Nudify AI?

Nudify AI is an artificial intelligence-based tool designed to modify images by digitally altering or removing clothing. The software uses deep learning and image processing algorithms to predict and generate what lies beneath the clothing based on patterns and textures. While some may use this technology for artistic or professional editing, it has also sparked ethical debates regarding privacy and misuse.

How Does Nudify Online Work?

With Nudify Online, users can access this AI-powered tool through web-based platforms without needing to download any software. The process typically involves:

Uploading an image to the Nudify Online tool.

Letting the AI analyze and process the image.

Downloading the altered version.

These online platforms make AI-driven image editing more accessible but also pose risks if used irresponsibly.

Ethical and Legal Considerations

While Nudify AI and Nudify Online may offer advanced image manipulation features, they come with serious ethical and legal concerns. Unauthorized image alteration can violate privacy rights and lead to legal consequences. It is crucial to use such technology responsibly, ensuring that it is not misused to harm or exploit individuals.

Conclusion

AI-powered tools like Nudify AI and Nudify Online highlight the power of modern technology, but they also demand ethical awareness. As AI continues to evolve, users must ensure they respect privacy, consent, and legal boundaries when using these tools.

[adultgirls-conference]

生成に使用したアプリはこちら😆

登録して服を脱がそう👙

[mariacallous]

Warning: This article discusses explicit adult content and child sexual abuse material (CSAM)

One of the world’s largest online video game marketplaces says it has referred user accounts to legal authorities after a Bellingcat investigation found tokens to create nonconsensual pornographic deepfakes were being surreptitiously sold on the site.

Accounts on G2A were being used to collect payments for Clothoff, one of the most popular and controversial nonconsensual pornographic deepfake sites on the internet. Clothoff disguised the sales as if they were for downloadable gaming content.

“Security is one of our top priorities that we never compromise on, hence we have taken immediate action and suspended the sellers in question until we have investigated it fully,” G2A said, in a statement. “We also decided to report the case to the appropriate authorities.” (G2A said it was reporting the accounts and the companies affiliated with them to authorities in the “companies’ countries of origin” which, as this story outlines below, varies but includes the US and New Zealand.)

Clothoff is part of a loosely affiliated network of similar platforms uncovered in Bellingcat’s investigation.

The network, which also includes the sites Nudify, Undress, and DrawNudes, has variously manipulated financial and online service providers that ban adult content and non-consensual deep fakes by disguising their activities to evade crackdowns. Other services they have tried to exploit include Coinbase, Patreon, Paypal, Shopify, Steam and Stripe.

Behind one G2A account that was selling tokens for Clothoff is an IT solutions firm called Aurora Borealis Limited Liability Company, listed on the account’s contact page. On its website, Aurora Borealis claims G2A is one of its partners, which the gaming marketplace said is false.

Aurora’s CEO, a Valencia-based entrepreneur named Vitalii Ionov, did not reply to a request for comment, nor did his company. Ionov, as this investigation details, is affiliated with multiple entities that overlap with Clothoff and the network of deepfake porn sites. Another company he is listed as the CEO of has also falsely claimed to be partners with other companies, including Microsoft.

This investigation also uncovered a fake Clothoff CEO who was, in fact, an AI-generated image. The fake CEO notwithstanding, a trail of open source records reveals a loose network of real companies with real people attached to them behind Clothoff, Nudify, Undress, and DrawNudes.

The rapid proliferation of non-consensual pornographic deepfakes is an alarming phenomenon. Legislators in the UK recently made sharing such images illegal, while a bipartisan group of US Senators have proposed a law that would allow people to sue over them. Images of underage girls generated by Clothoff are currently the subject of a Spanish police investigation.

A recent report by independent research group Graphika said that there was a 2,408 per cent increase in referral links to nonconsensual pornographic deepfake sites across Reddit and X in 2023. A 2019 report by Sensity, a company that detects and monitors deepfakes, found that 96 per cent of deepfakes are non-consensual porn and, of those, 99 per cent are of women.

In this story, we take you through how we linked some of the biggest AI deepfake domains together, how we traced their illicit financial networks, and how we discovered the people operating in the shadows behind them.

[affairsmastery]

The UK government has introduced four groundbreaking laws to combat AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM). It is now illegal to possess, create, or distribute AI tools designed for CSAM, with offenders facing up to five years in prison. Additional measures criminalize AI paedophile manuals, operating websites for child exploitation, and refusing Border Force access to digital devices.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper emphasized the urgency of adapting laws to tackle evolving online threats. While experts welcome the changes, some argue for stricter bans on "nudify" apps and AI-simulated abuse content to further protect children.

[undress-baby]

Nudify AI: Understanding the Power and Potential of This Technology

In the world of digital editing, the rise of AI-powered tools like Nudify AI has made significant waves. These technologies have gained attention for their ability to modify images in ways that were once thought to be impossible. Understanding the capabilities of Nudify AI is essential for users who want to explore its potential while also being mindful of its ethical implications.

Nudify AI technology uses advanced artificial intelligence to manipulate images, specifically removing or altering clothing in digital photos. The algorithm works by analyzing body shapes, textures, and clothing patterns to simulate what the image would look like without clothing. While some may find this technology intriguing for artistic purposes, it's crucial to understand the responsibility that comes with it. Nudify AI can be used for fashion design, art, or digital modeling; however, it also carries risks, particularly when misused for non-consensual purposes.

On the other hand, Nudify online platforms are widely available and make this technology even more accessible. Users can access these platforms directly through their web browsers without the need for any specialized software. While this makes the technology easy to use, it also raises concerns about privacy and misuse. Without proper regulations or guidelines, these online platforms could be exploited, especially when it comes to manipulating images of people without their consent.

In conclusion, Nudify AI and Nudify online platforms offer innovative tools for digital creators but also come with ethical challenges. It is essential to use these technologies responsibly, keeping in mind the potential consequences of non-consensual image manipulation. Users must exercise caution and always respect others' privacy when using these powerful tools.

[adultgirls-conference]

生成に使用したアプリはこちら😆

登録して服を脱がそう👙

[darkmaga-returns]

The Digital Revolution Was a Disastrous Mistake

Paul Craig Roberts

“Nudify” deepfake bots remove clothes from victims in minutes, and millions are using them. 

The disastrous consequences of the digital revolution are increasing exponentially.  Your face can be put on a person in a porn film. A clothed photo of you online can be unclothed.  Malwarebytes writes about the dangers from a politically correct leftwing perspective, such as objectifying women.  The biggest danger, however, is that the FBI and other police agencies can create images of a targeted person committing felonies and engaging in sex with under-aged persons.  Your voice can be captured and your lips synched with the words they put in your mouth.  So, you see, thanks to the digital revolution, not only are your bank account, investment account, and email hackable and insecure, but also incriminating evidence can be created to convict you.

Another casualty of the digital revolution is customer service. Think about how difficult it is to contact a customer service representative and how difficult it is to resolve a problem.  Think about the increasing authorizations you have to go through as service providers add more levels of security in a pointless effort to make an inherently insecure system secure.  Consider the frustration, stress, and wasted time. In the analogue days, one telephone call resolved the situation in a few minutes.  Now correcting a problem can require hours, even days.

It is amazing that people were so stupid as to think the digital revolution was a good thing.  The digital revolution is inconsistent with security and with freedom. The digital revolution is the enabler of tyranny.  Why was it imposed on us?

The digital revolution has even made your vacuum cleaner unreliable.